the photographic machine was able to recreate the reality out of us. so it was no longer necessary to recreate reality via a painting that would actually take longer to create then a photographic image.

the artist could now concentrate himself to his inner world. recreate images of his personal inner world. till then only described by words through various artists. now realized in a image. visible for us all.

she shift did not came immediatly or suddenly after the invention of the photographic machine.

the century before contemporary art made a shift from real image recreation to subjective recreations of the outerworld for almost several generations.

we call their art as impressions the artists as impressionists. it is a recreation of the personal perception of the world by the artists. they made the first step that would lead to contemporary art in the change of the 19th to the 20th century.

the third important influence in creation contemporary art was psychology. experimental psychology or better physical psychology and their discovery of the psychology of perception created the philosophical legislation for the shift of art of reality to art of psychology. the fashionable theories of psychoanalysis at that age did their part for an environment that created the contemporary art.

recreation of nature is not necessary not a artform anymore since a photographic machine can create a much better image of the real world they argued.

so they created cubic images. geometric figures out of real images. created real images out of geometric figures. reduced the complexity of nature to some geometric figures. they added their visual world. the visual world of the inner world to the image. so they made a new artform.

in this perception they were shortsighted. first of all real images, photographic images of the outer world are a relative new movement in art. the renaissance for example had real photographic images in christian art. the first time in christian art real realizations of the world with the real dimensions and realations of the visualized images. despite that the paintings were not photographic images as we would see a painting of the impressionists. the paintings were symbolic. sybolic as the byzantine art is. we have a real lion a real person a real whatever and every image stands for something. it is not a photographic realization. a lion for example in a renaissance painting means pride. so they symbol or the symbols of these paintins carry the painting. additional to that the geometrical composition of the paintings takes the second rank. mostly composed in a triangle. respresenting the trinity.

so we see on two examples subjectivity and geometry were issues in paintings before contemporary art created or discovered it for themselfes. we had them both already in paintings years before.

the third issue search for psychological truth is not new also. even if it was covered in theology in christian times. both movements sought for truth inner truth. discovery of the inner world.

so what really brought contemporary art. that´s the question it is. first of all our brief review showed that it has no rights to look down to the academic art of the generations before them. since they add nothing new to art.

He made the impossible possible when it would be considered impossible than as the word says it is not possible and it does not contain the possibility or the ability to be possible if it would be so then we could not say it was impossible since it came to possibility or reality it showed that it was not impossible would it be impossible then it would have not come to reality since it came to reality then we can consider it was possible it contained the possibility to be possible or able to be real so we can say he never made the impossible possible since this is impossible he made the possible possible what was able to be realized has been realized it is not necessary that the ability to be realized leads to realization many things that are able to be realized are not realized but still are possible to be realized even when they are not realized still they are possible the realization of the possible depends on the person who realizes the possible when it is impossible he can not realize the impossible even when he wants to realize the impossible since it is impossible it is not possible to be realized