the photographic machine was able to recreate the reality out of us. so it was no longer necessary to recreate reality via a painting that would actually take longer to create then a photographic image.

the artist could now concentrate himself to his inner world. recreate images of his personal inner world. till then only described by words through various artists. now realized in a image. visible for us all.

she shift did not came immediatly or suddenly after the invention of the photographic machine.

the century before contemporary art made a shift from real image recreation to subjective recreations of the outerworld for almost several generations.

we call their art as impressions the artists as impressionists. it is a recreation of the personal perception of the world by the artists. they made the first step that would lead to contemporary art in the change of the 19th to the 20th century.

the third important influence in creation contemporary art was psychology. experimental psychology or better physical psychology and their discovery of the psychology of perception created the philosophical legislation for the shift of art of reality to art of psychology. the fashionable theories of psychoanalysis at that age did their part for an environment that created the contemporary art.

recreation of nature is not necessary not a artform anymore since a photographic machine can create a much better image of the real world they argued.

so they created cubic images. geometric figures out of real images. created real images out of geometric figures. reduced the complexity of nature to some geometric figures. they added their visual world. the visual world of the inner world to the image. so they made a new artform.

in this perception they were shortsighted. first of all real images, photographic images of the outer world are a relative new movement in art. the renaissance for example had real photographic images in christian art. the first time in christian art real realizations of the world with the real dimensions and realations of the visualized images. despite that the paintings were not photographic images as we would see a painting of the impressionists. the paintings were symbolic. sybolic as the byzantine art is. we have a real lion a real person a real whatever and every image stands for something. it is not a photographic realization. a lion for example in a renaissance painting means pride. so they symbol or the symbols of these paintins carry the painting. additional to that the geometrical composition of the paintings takes the second rank. mostly composed in a triangle. respresenting the trinity.

so we see on two examples subjectivity and geometry were issues in paintings before contemporary art created or discovered it for themselfes. we had them both already in paintings years before.

the third issue search for psychological truth is not new also. even if it was covered in theology in christian times. both movements sought for truth inner truth. discovery of the inner world.

so what really brought contemporary art. that´s the question it is. first of all our brief review showed that it has no rights to look down to the academic art of the generations before them. since they add nothing new to art.

when we compare the human being with the other living than we can see that human is not very ahead over the other living and there is no reason to name a state of being superior with the word human or humanistic when everything human is lets say inferior to the other living

 let us take his senses his eye site is very inferior to many living an eagle is far superior to a human regarding its eyesite so is an owl and i think there a several living that are ahead of the humans his hearing is also inferior to other living i think rabbits and other similar small animals have much better hearing than the human take the smell than the humans servant the dog is much superior to the human and i think snakes also have a much better smell than humans taste i think is also at snakes for more advanced than humans senses the tactile sense now i have to pass my knowledge i am sure little bit of research will find an animal that is far ahead in that area too besides that there are animals that possess senses that are not available with humans so is its electrical organ for some fish so it is the sonar for bats so it is the magnetic sense wich birds use to coordinate their flight with the earth magnatic field and others and when it comes to our much praised family sense than again an elephant and dolphin are much ahead of the humans and it is also not known to animals to do cruelty to children we humans are known about like violence abuse sexual exploitation and others

so called themselfes humanist means being proud of being human and feeling themself superior to others due to its human nature but we saw that humans have no reason to feel superior since there is no field wich humans can be proud of being ahead since they are not ahead

either the word human humanist is the wrong discription for a superior state of being since the human shows no superiority in a biological sense than we can only assume that is ment in a moral way even seen that humans have no moral superiority and being human is not a reason to be proud but lets go this way anyway in a academic way than we have to use another word for moral superiority or better state of moral superiority of some human beings over the others since we saw being human is not a state of proudness but a defeat in every area biological and moral

i am not proud of being a human and i am not a humanist i can not be proud of being an inferior biological and moral being 

weird mind

throughout every living life demands it self every living obeys the demands of life their whole thinking is about the demands of life the living has in this manner no free will in wich it expresses it self though every step it does is to obey the demands of life the eye that sees the world obeys the demand of life it is not free in its will everything the eye sees is to sustain life is to prepare this life for to obey the demands of life and nothing else so the eye is not free in its seeing and as we saw earlier that life is unnatural so it is this eye that sees nature since its demand is not to see the natural but to obey the demands of life and nothing else what this eye sees is nothing else but what life requestes from this life and nothing beyond that and in this way it is not able to see beyond the demands of life the question is is this eye in any oquation able to step outside life and see the world beyond the demands of life or is it damned to its position to select the world for the demands of life and unselect what is refused by life but we saw that nature refuses life except in very tiny places very fragile and the majority of nature does not accept life except in tiny spots like the earth and everything beyond refuses life the tragedy of a human is he has to step out of life to experience the world beyond the demands of life but with stepping out of life it loose the ability to experience and witness life and measure life and question life someone who is under the demand of life and nothing else than the demand of life should question the demand of life and experience a state of being beyond life while he it self is the demand of life a weird position we are in indeed how can i see the world when everything i am is demand of life while nature is not life and refuses life and does not allow life i am the demand of life and i obey my master and his wishes and is me not allowed to disobey its demand since it will end this life as every tyrant it does not allow to see me something that would make me behave in a different way that its demands so all i see is to continue to obey the demands of life everything else is not allowed and everything else is nature ergo does life not allow to see nature except in a way that obeys the demands of life and nothing beyond everything i see is to continue to obey the demands of life but the world is bigger than the demands of life which remains closed for our eye 

now i try something as usual i am not sure whether i am ready for this theme following is to order my head and write down some theses as a first step to develop a philosophy around it or better on it it is not finished it is the beginning it is for sorting out yet let´s try it out

the natural state in universe is darkness the universe is in it´s nature darkness light is the exception and appears only in a few spots in the universe

heading to the light and enlightenment is unnatural

life is the exception in the universe life is only possible under some circumstances this circumstances does not appear everywhere and it´s environment is very fragile

life is unnatural it requires constant activity to exist it has no natural state of existence if constant activity does not happen life disappears life cannot exist by itself without activity

life requires the death of the other life is only possible through the death of another living being be it a plant or an animal life has always terminate the life of the other or benefit from the death of the other to exist

death is the dissolve of a living being after the activity is no longer made death is the dissolve of the living to it´s natural being

life is unnatural

science is the observation of the outer through a living all living reviews the outer through it´s use for the living through it´s relation to the living a view of the outer without the consideration of the living the observer is not complete all science forgets the observer and assumes the observation without the observer is a satisfactory all science misses the observer science follows the relations of the observed and misses the observer as if there is a clear reconstruction in the observer without the observer the observer always views the observed with the relation of the observed to the observer the observer can not observe without a relation to the observed the moment the observer builds the relation it looses the ability of a pure observation a pure observation is not likely a observer has to build a relation to the observed it can not watch unrelated every relation is biased determinate by the needs of the observer

He made the impossible possible when it would be considered impossible than as the word says it is not possible and it does not contain the possibility or the ability to be possible if it would be so then we could not say it was impossible since it came to possibility or reality it showed that it was not impossible would it be impossible then it would have not come to reality since it came to reality then we can consider it was possible it contained the possibility to be possible or able to be real so we can say he never made the impossible possible since this is impossible he made the possible possible what was able to be realized has been realized it is not necessary that the ability to be realized leads to realization many things that are able to be realized are not realized but still are possible to be realized even when they are not realized still they are possible the realization of the possible depends on the person who realizes the possible when it is impossible he can not realize the impossible even when he wants to realize the impossible since it is impossible it is not possible to be realized

Today I try something out as always I have my ideas for a new blog post while writing something on twitter and when the 140 characters become a too narrow place and I quill over the blank pages I know I have something for my blog the latest issue that bathered my mind was about what we know we are pretty much sure in what we know especially in what we know now we know that what we know now is the latest we know and we know it better we know it better than yesterday and we judge everything in this world by this what we know what we know good today and in what we believe in we have no doubt in it and we don´t waste much time in evaluating ourselves every time we know and that´s enough and since everyone else know also we don´t have any reason to question our we know since one person can be wrong sometimes two persons will be wrong much less likely when one is driving in the wrong direction on a highway than he will think he may use the wrong lane to drive but when there are two driving the wrong lane than there is a possibility than the others driving in your direction on your lane may be wrong but we drift away from our main purpose I was reading a book about a ancient society where a writer was sure that this artifact has to be seen this way since this and that was his thought and right at that point another picture popped up in my head the issue of the phallic images in pompej and herculaneum when they excavated these ancient sites they discovered on many housings images and sculptures of erected penises on some houses the scientist where very fast to analyze them as brothels others had a explanation of a very erotic society a society of very loose morals where sexuality was taken in a very loose manner and suddenly there where the old imaginations that have been created when christian writers asked themselves what happens in the serail especially in the sultans harem and their fantasy created the images to their wishes however we drift away again we knew something we knew very well this images were sticked to houses which were once brothels and other pleasure establishments and we were not disturbed by the huge number of brothels in pompej since they were a very loose society however we knew it good and no reason for doubt and than one day we couldn´t ignore another finding and suddenly we knew that phallic images in ancient times were used to protect the housing against evil forces against evil spirits and the phallus will absorb every evil force that is poised against this household and this household is protected against this evil forces now we have a problem we knew once something we were very sure about that this was our right and when we couldn´t ignore a new finding we have a new right about which we are very sure and have no doubt about we are sure about our current as we have been sure when we have had our old knowing now what separates us and our old is our new we know we look back to one point before now and we know better than our old us and now we know better than before but here our journey starts the time has three dimensions it has a present a past and a future we are between past and future we look in the past and we know better we know that present is better than past since a new knowledge separates us from past now when we consider that a new we know will divide us from future that present and future are divided through a new we know like present and past are divided by a new we know we come to a real dilemma how can we live and move in a current present when we know that all we know is wrong in the eyes of the future us that is divided from us only by this new knowledge once we know we were wrong in the past we know we can be wrong in our present as we have been in our past we can´t know our future us because than we would be our future us so we are in a position where we know we are wrong and move in a we are wrong since our future us says to us one step further I will tell you that you are wrong but we can make our steps only in a we know it we make our steps in our journey in a we are right we know but when we know that our right is wrong and has been but we don´t know our right since we have to take a step within our right to know that our right is a wrong we have to make every step in our life yes I know and want it this way but I also know that I am wrong since I was wrong

the never ending war in the east … against wild people … threatnin´our way of life … our freedom … so we have to sacrifice … our freedom … our people … our money … our … our … our … our …

(comment first posted on a newspaper comment forum) if you don´t have a competitive economy the proper technological and social foundations and a well educated society … you get screwed by who have these … the problem is not the power of america … it is the weakness of islamic societies … don´t make the strong weaker … make the weak stronger … that means you have to reshape your societies , instead of crying in your corner of the world about the strong … you are like the people in the bible crying about babylon, egypt and rome , and unable to create a similar beautiful, advanced society, ready to reach the sky …

Hello, here i start my new Blog don´t have an issue yet but still to come, you will be informed through twitter , waiting for your comments …