weird mind

throughout every living life demands it self every living obeys the demands of life their whole thinking is about the demands of life the living has in this manner no free will in wich it expresses it self though every step it does is to obey the demands of life the eye that sees the world obeys the demand of life it is not free in its will everything the eye sees is to sustain life is to prepare this life for to obey the demands of life and nothing else so the eye is not free in its seeing and as we saw earlier that life is unnatural so it is this eye that sees nature since its demand is not to see the natural but to obey the demands of life and nothing else what this eye sees is nothing else but what life requestes from this life and nothing beyond that and in this way it is not able to see beyond the demands of life the question is is this eye in any oquation able to step outside life and see the world beyond the demands of life or is it damned to its position to select the world for the demands of life and unselect what is refused by life but we saw that nature refuses life except in very tiny places very fragile and the majority of nature does not accept life except in tiny spots like the earth and everything beyond refuses life the tragedy of a human is he has to step out of life to experience the world beyond the demands of life but with stepping out of life it loose the ability to experience and witness life and measure life and question life someone who is under the demand of life and nothing else than the demand of life should question the demand of life and experience a state of being beyond life while he it self is the demand of life a weird position we are in indeed how can i see the world when everything i am is demand of life while nature is not life and refuses life and does not allow life i am the demand of life and i obey my master and his wishes and is me not allowed to disobey its demand since it will end this life as every tyrant it does not allow to see me something that would make me behave in a different way that its demands so all i see is to continue to obey the demands of life everything else is not allowed and everything else is nature ergo does life not allow to see nature except in a way that obeys the demands of life and nothing beyond everything i see is to continue to obey the demands of life but the world is bigger than the demands of life which remains closed for our eye 

Today I try something out as always I have my ideas for a new blog post while writing something on twitter and when the 140 characters become a too narrow place and I quill over the blank pages I know I have something for my blog the latest issue that bathered my mind was about what we know we are pretty much sure in what we know especially in what we know now we know that what we know now is the latest we know and we know it better we know it better than yesterday and we judge everything in this world by this what we know what we know good today and in what we believe in we have no doubt in it and we don´t waste much time in evaluating ourselves every time we know and that´s enough and since everyone else know also we don´t have any reason to question our we know since one person can be wrong sometimes two persons will be wrong much less likely when one is driving in the wrong direction on a highway than he will think he may use the wrong lane to drive but when there are two driving the wrong lane than there is a possibility than the others driving in your direction on your lane may be wrong but we drift away from our main purpose I was reading a book about a ancient society where a writer was sure that this artifact has to be seen this way since this and that was his thought and right at that point another picture popped up in my head the issue of the phallic images in pompej and herculaneum when they excavated these ancient sites they discovered on many housings images and sculptures of erected penises on some houses the scientist where very fast to analyze them as brothels others had a explanation of a very erotic society a society of very loose morals where sexuality was taken in a very loose manner and suddenly there where the old imaginations that have been created when christian writers asked themselves what happens in the serail especially in the sultans harem and their fantasy created the images to their wishes however we drift away again we knew something we knew very well this images were sticked to houses which were once brothels and other pleasure establishments and we were not disturbed by the huge number of brothels in pompej since they were a very loose society however we knew it good and no reason for doubt and than one day we couldn´t ignore another finding and suddenly we knew that phallic images in ancient times were used to protect the housing against evil forces against evil spirits and the phallus will absorb every evil force that is poised against this household and this household is protected against this evil forces now we have a problem we knew once something we were very sure about that this was our right and when we couldn´t ignore a new finding we have a new right about which we are very sure and have no doubt about we are sure about our current as we have been sure when we have had our old knowing now what separates us and our old is our new we know we look back to one point before now and we know better than our old us and now we know better than before but here our journey starts the time has three dimensions it has a present a past and a future we are between past and future we look in the past and we know better we know that present is better than past since a new knowledge separates us from past now when we consider that a new we know will divide us from future that present and future are divided through a new we know like present and past are divided by a new we know we come to a real dilemma how can we live and move in a current present when we know that all we know is wrong in the eyes of the future us that is divided from us only by this new knowledge once we know we were wrong in the past we know we can be wrong in our present as we have been in our past we can´t know our future us because than we would be our future us so we are in a position where we know we are wrong and move in a we are wrong since our future us says to us one step further I will tell you that you are wrong but we can make our steps only in a we know it we make our steps in our journey in a we are right we know but when we know that our right is wrong and has been but we don´t know our right since we have to take a step within our right to know that our right is a wrong we have to make every step in our life yes I know and want it this way but I also know that I am wrong since I was wrong

                                                                                                1

(Iranian clerics wants to harsh punishments for protesters implemented. He demands even the death penalty for the leaders of the protests in Iran. Here is my responce to that clerics opinion / demand) for waging a war against god god has to exist since god doesn´t exist you cannot wage a war against god since you cannot wage a war against god you cannot commit a crime since you cannot commit a crime you cannot be punished for waging a war against god henceforce these protesters cannot be punished – some aristoteles logic is enough to solve this matter – for this case the case is you want to punish the protesters you have to invent god in order to be able to punish people who oppose the ruling class since the order of the ruling class is devine in its nature and represents it´s will and it´s moral philosophy -  in this case marx is right when he says that god builds a concrete around the status quo and it is counterrevolutionary in its nature – a strong tool of the bourgoisie to rule the masses – in this case the easiest way to liberate the iranians would be to exterminate the concept of god

                                                                                                  2

moralphilosophy is always the secular flipside of the religion coin. a moral man is always a religious man in this or that manner. a moral man is always convinced of it´s morality and often very stubborn regarding critics over his morality ethics. for a religious man the stubborness is easy to explain god is the truth he is devine in it´s nature so is his moral philosophy ergo it can´t be questioned. you cannot question a devine mind. but how do we explain the stubbornness of the socialist moral people who defend their moral value system with the same ignorance and stubborness of the religious people. freud can help a little bit but still leaves some questions open. when you take your moralsystem as ideal-ego and comply fully with your ego. in this case you will feel no guilt for not behaving according to the ideals tought to you by parental figueres. when you replace father parental figuere with god than you have the same concept like the religious people have. Ideal-ego and ego are the same no guilt ergo no conflict ergo the illusion of truth reality or of right. the ignorance in this concept is the truth or value of the value gains through the identical position of ideal-ego and ego. demand and super-ego (ideal-ego) comply and you gain a feel of right. this feel of right exists only by the identical position of ideal-ego and ego. you cannot make a conclusion about the value of the value. the most important question is the function of the value. what society does this value create and who does this value serve. who will be master and who will be servant under this value if this value come to power wich is something all values demand. they want to rule the outer world the other person as it rules the person wich carries this value currently.

                                                                                                 3

the difference between moral philosophy and nihilistic philosophy is clearly that moralphilosophy judges his value through a warm feeling and a feeling of right and wrong through a demand this should be wich rules the person. a nihilistic philosophy always asks what function does this value has and always values this value through it´s function in the case it researches. the value does not become a value by it´s nature by itself a value becomes a value by the gain this value will produce in this system it should be installed or not (or better wich is observed should this value be installed) it does not feel a moral imperativ for the installment of a value. it looks what function will that value have who will be master and does it serve it´s purpose. warm feeling moral imperativ and funciton are the major points wich devide moralphilosophy (wich includes political correctness and other modern values as well as religious imperatives or heritage of values) and a nihilistic philosophy.

(comment first posted on a newspaper comment forum) if you don´t have a competitive economy the proper technological and social foundations and a well educated society … you get screwed by who have these … the problem is not the power of america … it is the weakness of islamic societies … don´t make the strong weaker … make the weak stronger … that means you have to reshape your societies , instead of crying in your corner of the world about the strong … you are like the people in the bible crying about babylon, egypt and rome , and unable to create a similar beautiful, advanced society, ready to reach the sky …

Hello, here i start my new Blog don´t have an issue yet but still to come, you will be informed through twitter , waiting for your comments …