civilization is a fight against nature. one you hear all the ages. the cry for back to the nature. many times humans are fed up with society and seek tranquility in nature. tranquility in the simple rural lifestyle. but how accurate is their desire.

civilization is a constant fight against nature. if you don´t fight nature it takes his territory back. pretty much ruthless in his efforts. so is civilization. it is a fight between two with no regrets no remorse. both have to loose everything.

in our nihilistic view it is always not a view of right or wrong. just a what is going on and no masks please. no peachy words please. show me the world as it is unmasked. have getting rid of grammatics and other vocabulary wich makes us life easier and more beautiful.

first we can not go back to nature because we have to dust all the time. everytime we sweep away the dust of our furniture or clothes we fight nature. everyone who washed his cloth his accomodation or himself faught nature: he can tell us what he wants – he can make himself a boy of nature that respects the balance. when he dusted he faught that balance, that dynamic they call natural. conclusio every cleaning dusting sweeping is unnatural and against nature a man who respects nature will never dust clean wash sweep let enter nature his life and respects it´s superiorty. he is full of respect for the forces of nature that he never will do anything to disturb that balance.

whenever he feels a burb fart or any other bodyly expression he will accept this as a natural cycle. forces of nature. a balance he cannot disturb or intervene. nature has to flow naturally. every human intervention would hinder the natural harmony established in hundreds of million years or created by an intelligent design: which way you take it is unimportant – do not disturb or intervene in this devine order – if you feel a burb fart iching do it don´t hold it back let nature go it´s way his way.

evolution or intelligent design made up different animals and different plants you have to respect them. do not pick them up root them out or fight them. nature has a plan with these species. it is natures (or gods) will to be so so let it be. fighting nature is fighting the great plan. deus vult. when a horsefly crosses your road or any other stinging insect let it be. allow nature to gow his way. if you hit an antfarm with your foot and you are swarm with billions of ants eating your flesh from your living body allow it is natures and gods will it is their plan to be so. it has sense and meaning. there is a greater plan behind it you can´t see now. allow nature to go his way. you have a spider in your house building a nest, bedbugs nesting in your matrass flies eating your dinner or other crawling insects: do not disturb nature: deus vult naturam vult. you disturb a dvine great order if you intervene in to the balance of nature allow them to flow and grow and go. if it happens that you live in africa and a lion crosses your way do not use your shutgun: allow nature go it´s way. nature (god) designed lions to eat human leave your rifle.

if it happens that your body is overgrown with bacteria and viruses allow them to grow: do not use medicine to fight them back. bacteria and virus are elements of nature there is a reason why they are on earth evolution (god) wanted them to be. every human intervention in nature disturbs the balance of nature. allow bacteria and virus grow in and on your body even if it takes your life. how dare you to disturb the harmony destroy the balance. this natural harmony is essential to sustain nature.

if you have a garden and the garden plants are moving into your house do not cut your garden plants or moe your lawn. it is natural that plants grow and they need their space hour housing hinders their way: so move your housing and let the plants breeze or allow them to take over your house and live with the plants – don´t you ever dare to hinder nature in it´s natural move. plants grow you can´t accuse them for being plants – how dare you ! unnatural being you !

if nature shakes the ground rivers float your accomodation storms sweep them away mudslides burry your housing and family don´t be angry it is natures (and gods) will to be so: deus vult.

weird mind

throughout every living life demands it self every living obeys the demands of life their whole thinking is about the demands of life the living has in this manner no free will in wich it expresses it self though every step it does is to obey the demands of life the eye that sees the world obeys the demand of life it is not free in its will everything the eye sees is to sustain life is to prepare this life for to obey the demands of life and nothing else so the eye is not free in its seeing and as we saw earlier that life is unnatural so it is this eye that sees nature since its demand is not to see the natural but to obey the demands of life and nothing else what this eye sees is nothing else but what life requestes from this life and nothing beyond that and in this way it is not able to see beyond the demands of life the question is is this eye in any oquation able to step outside life and see the world beyond the demands of life or is it damned to its position to select the world for the demands of life and unselect what is refused by life but we saw that nature refuses life except in very tiny places very fragile and the majority of nature does not accept life except in tiny spots like the earth and everything beyond refuses life the tragedy of a human is he has to step out of life to experience the world beyond the demands of life but with stepping out of life it loose the ability to experience and witness life and measure life and question life someone who is under the demand of life and nothing else than the demand of life should question the demand of life and experience a state of being beyond life while he it self is the demand of life a weird position we are in indeed how can i see the world when everything i am is demand of life while nature is not life and refuses life and does not allow life i am the demand of life and i obey my master and his wishes and is me not allowed to disobey its demand since it will end this life as every tyrant it does not allow to see me something that would make me behave in a different way that its demands so all i see is to continue to obey the demands of life everything else is not allowed and everything else is nature ergo does life not allow to see nature except in a way that obeys the demands of life and nothing beyond everything i see is to continue to obey the demands of life but the world is bigger than the demands of life which remains closed for our eye 

now i try something as usual i am not sure whether i am ready for this theme following is to order my head and write down some theses as a first step to develop a philosophy around it or better on it it is not finished it is the beginning it is for sorting out yet let´s try it out

the natural state in universe is darkness the universe is in it´s nature darkness light is the exception and appears only in a few spots in the universe

heading to the light and enlightenment is unnatural

life is the exception in the universe life is only possible under some circumstances this circumstances does not appear everywhere and it´s environment is very fragile

life is unnatural it requires constant activity to exist it has no natural state of existence if constant activity does not happen life disappears life cannot exist by itself without activity

life requires the death of the other life is only possible through the death of another living being be it a plant or an animal life has always terminate the life of the other or benefit from the death of the other to exist

death is the dissolve of a living being after the activity is no longer made death is the dissolve of the living to it´s natural being

life is unnatural

science is the observation of the outer through a living all living reviews the outer through it´s use for the living through it´s relation to the living a view of the outer without the consideration of the living the observer is not complete all science forgets the observer and assumes the observation without the observer is a satisfactory all science misses the observer science follows the relations of the observed and misses the observer as if there is a clear reconstruction in the observer without the observer the observer always views the observed with the relation of the observed to the observer the observer can not observe without a relation to the observed the moment the observer builds the relation it looses the ability of a pure observation a pure observation is not likely a observer has to build a relation to the observed it can not watch unrelated every relation is biased determinate by the needs of the observer