when we compare the human being with the other living than we can see that human is not very ahead over the other living and there is no reason to name a state of being superior with the word human or humanistic when everything human is lets say inferior to the other living

 let us take his senses his eye site is very inferior to many living an eagle is far superior to a human regarding its eyesite so is an owl and i think there a several living that are ahead of the humans his hearing is also inferior to other living i think rabbits and other similar small animals have much better hearing than the human take the smell than the humans servant the dog is much superior to the human and i think snakes also have a much better smell than humans taste i think is also at snakes for more advanced than humans senses the tactile sense now i have to pass my knowledge i am sure little bit of research will find an animal that is far ahead in that area too besides that there are animals that possess senses that are not available with humans so is its electrical organ for some fish so it is the sonar for bats so it is the magnetic sense wich birds use to coordinate their flight with the earth magnatic field and others and when it comes to our much praised family sense than again an elephant and dolphin are much ahead of the humans and it is also not known to animals to do cruelty to children we humans are known about like violence abuse sexual exploitation and others

so called themselfes humanist means being proud of being human and feeling themself superior to others due to its human nature but we saw that humans have no reason to feel superior since there is no field wich humans can be proud of being ahead since they are not ahead

either the word human humanist is the wrong discription for a superior state of being since the human shows no superiority in a biological sense than we can only assume that is ment in a moral way even seen that humans have no moral superiority and being human is not a reason to be proud but lets go this way anyway in a academic way than we have to use another word for moral superiority or better state of moral superiority of some human beings over the others since we saw being human is not a state of proudness but a defeat in every area biological and moral

i am not proud of being a human and i am not a humanist i can not be proud of being an inferior biological and moral being 

                                                                                                1

(Iranian clerics wants to harsh punishments for protesters implemented. He demands even the death penalty for the leaders of the protests in Iran. Here is my responce to that clerics opinion / demand) for waging a war against god god has to exist since god doesn´t exist you cannot wage a war against god since you cannot wage a war against god you cannot commit a crime since you cannot commit a crime you cannot be punished for waging a war against god henceforce these protesters cannot be punished – some aristoteles logic is enough to solve this matter – for this case the case is you want to punish the protesters you have to invent god in order to be able to punish people who oppose the ruling class since the order of the ruling class is devine in its nature and represents it´s will and it´s moral philosophy -  in this case marx is right when he says that god builds a concrete around the status quo and it is counterrevolutionary in its nature – a strong tool of the bourgoisie to rule the masses – in this case the easiest way to liberate the iranians would be to exterminate the concept of god

                                                                                                  2

moralphilosophy is always the secular flipside of the religion coin. a moral man is always a religious man in this or that manner. a moral man is always convinced of it´s morality and often very stubborn regarding critics over his morality ethics. for a religious man the stubborness is easy to explain god is the truth he is devine in it´s nature so is his moral philosophy ergo it can´t be questioned. you cannot question a devine mind. but how do we explain the stubbornness of the socialist moral people who defend their moral value system with the same ignorance and stubborness of the religious people. freud can help a little bit but still leaves some questions open. when you take your moralsystem as ideal-ego and comply fully with your ego. in this case you will feel no guilt for not behaving according to the ideals tought to you by parental figueres. when you replace father parental figuere with god than you have the same concept like the religious people have. Ideal-ego and ego are the same no guilt ergo no conflict ergo the illusion of truth reality or of right. the ignorance in this concept is the truth or value of the value gains through the identical position of ideal-ego and ego. demand and super-ego (ideal-ego) comply and you gain a feel of right. this feel of right exists only by the identical position of ideal-ego and ego. you cannot make a conclusion about the value of the value. the most important question is the function of the value. what society does this value create and who does this value serve. who will be master and who will be servant under this value if this value come to power wich is something all values demand. they want to rule the outer world the other person as it rules the person wich carries this value currently.

                                                                                                 3

the difference between moral philosophy and nihilistic philosophy is clearly that moralphilosophy judges his value through a warm feeling and a feeling of right and wrong through a demand this should be wich rules the person. a nihilistic philosophy always asks what function does this value has and always values this value through it´s function in the case it researches. the value does not become a value by it´s nature by itself a value becomes a value by the gain this value will produce in this system it should be installed or not (or better wich is observed should this value be installed) it does not feel a moral imperativ for the installment of a value. it looks what function will that value have who will be master and does it serve it´s purpose. warm feeling moral imperativ and funciton are the major points wich devide moralphilosophy (wich includes political correctness and other modern values as well as religious imperatives or heritage of values) and a nihilistic philosophy.

the never ending war in the east … against wild people … threatnin´our way of life … our freedom … so we have to sacrifice … our freedom … our people … our money … our … our … our … our …