all information we gather about the human show the contrary.

lately we saw a octopuss using a tool. a last refuge for our greatness vanished. we hardly accepted that some apes use tools. now we have to deal with the issue that spineless squids know how to use a tool. what a desaster for a selfcentered being.

being humanist is always used in terms regarding the protection of the human or living. human society showed humans reach their height under danger and extreme circumstances. protected environment lead to mediocre life. he becomes good but not inventive. all great invention that enhanced human life was a invention for war or the asociated industries or craftworks.

is the human the center of the universe. hardly. mathematicly it is possible for developing circumstances that protect or make possible life. it is possible that the life on other places in the universe is much more advanced and the living their are much more advanced living then the human are.

and is the human the most advanced on earth. he has tools so the squid. he has housing so do many living building nests, he has family so do many living and with more care, he has wisdom, we don´t know about the widom of the other living, you can´t compare, and the other living is far ahead it has greater eyes, better ears, greater smell, better taste, more senses electric organs, infrared, ultrasonic sound wave and other senses we know nothing.

turn the page we know nothing.

now i try something as usual i am not sure whether i am ready for this theme following is to order my head and write down some theses as a first step to develop a philosophy around it or better on it it is not finished it is the beginning it is for sorting out yet let´s try it out

the natural state in universe is darkness the universe is in it´s nature darkness light is the exception and appears only in a few spots in the universe

heading to the light and enlightenment is unnatural

life is the exception in the universe life is only possible under some circumstances this circumstances does not appear everywhere and it´s environment is very fragile

life is unnatural it requires constant activity to exist it has no natural state of existence if constant activity does not happen life disappears life cannot exist by itself without activity

life requires the death of the other life is only possible through the death of another living being be it a plant or an animal life has always terminate the life of the other or benefit from the death of the other to exist

death is the dissolve of a living being after the activity is no longer made death is the dissolve of the living to it´s natural being

life is unnatural

science is the observation of the outer through a living all living reviews the outer through it´s use for the living through it´s relation to the living a view of the outer without the consideration of the living the observer is not complete all science forgets the observer and assumes the observation without the observer is a satisfactory all science misses the observer science follows the relations of the observed and misses the observer as if there is a clear reconstruction in the observer without the observer the observer always views the observed with the relation of the observed to the observer the observer can not observe without a relation to the observed the moment the observer builds the relation it looses the ability of a pure observation a pure observation is not likely a observer has to build a relation to the observed it can not watch unrelated every relation is biased determinate by the needs of the observer