suspicious mind » politology

blow up nuclear scientist

Erbil Kücük — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:06:18 +0000

“The United States had absolutely nothing to do with this … We strongly condemn all acts of violence, including acts of violence like what is being reported today,” White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said. -THAT´S WHAT THEY SAID HOWEVER – WHAT THEY DO IS ANOTHER STORY : AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY HAS ALWAYS BEEN THAT OF AN BULLY : POLITICAL MURDER HAS ALWAYS BEEN A TOOL OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY IN SECOND AND THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES – SO NOTHING NEW ON THIS FRONT . IN AMERICAN POLITICS YOU ALWAYS HAVE TO LOOK AT THE ACTIONS ON THE GROUND . UNFORTUNATELY THE COVERING OF NEWS I LIMITED TO SPEECHES ; WELL REHEARSED I MIGHT ADD ; AND LITTLE INVESTIGATED : KINDA RENAISSANCE CULTURE HERE I MIGHT ADD ; WHERE ONCE YOU KILLED YOUR OPPONENED THEN PUBLICLY GRIEVED HIS DECEASE AND INSTALLED A GRAND BURIAL CEREMONY EVEN A STATUE IN SOME CASES.

divided congress

Erbil Kücük — Sat, 03 Sep 2011 17:42:12 +0000

If you complaint that your congress is divided then you are a fascist : cause the reason for democracy is diversity of opinions you should be concerned that your congress is divided into only two pieces : when instead every respectable democracy has more then two parties to offer : you are more like a two party oligarchic minority regime – cause we know how many participate in your elections.

The congress is divided the congress is divided: all we here these days from american politics – be it journalists be it politicians be it citizens repeating what they hear from their politicians and their journalists. However the disturbing part of this lies in a so called democratic society complaining that their politicians has dividing thoughts and opinions on their issues and pulling in different directions in their solutions for their issues in domestic politics. All they demand is a united congress that speaks in one voice and or a strong leader that leads them to speak in one voice : however how you take it – it is a dangerous demand and a democratic society should not make a demand that way.

A modern society is made up by diversity it is a very complex organisation and it´s main characteristic is that they do not have many things in common anymore : many different groups and professions have different intrerests and they are reflected in their political demands: they are diverse and conflict each other and they have no time or sense for the others interests as it is the common way of life in our economics : my demands this way you are in my way get out – bullyish – and nothing wrong with that.

If we have to make a projection into the future we have also to think if an institution like parliament and state will surive our current economic development : we will left with markets and no states.

Back to our issue: plurality and diversity in opinions and demands are a major characteristic of modern societies. You can´t do anything against divided unless you crawl under a stone and decide to live there your day´s.

cruzifiction

Erbil Kücük — Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:26:07 +0000

seneca writes (letter to marcia) “some established the cruzifiction in that way that the head is turned down to earth, others let the stake run through the genitals others let the arms spread during hanging …” [20] further down he writes “for ever arm/leg for ever ankle, they invented another contraption …” [20]

the most striking spot in this quote lies in the words cruzifiction and head turned down to earth. we have mentioned the cruzifiction, from a non christian source, which is very important to avoid propagandistic rhetoric, and we have the head turned down to earth, which is important to discuss an issue with paul or paulus which ever definition you take.

since there is no proof of feeding people to lions, other than the regular games for gladiators, where people and animal fight, we have one source that proof one part of the christian story.

back to our main research. paulus as well known wished to be cruzified with the head down because he did not desire to die in a way known for christ.

well we don´t know if paulus and christ ever lived: however a non christian source tells us of cruzifiction and a practise of hanging people head down during cruzifiction.

from this source we can tell there were different forms of cruzifiction in practise whichever way told or mentioned in the bible may be a local or bound to that governor pilatus a practise he prefered and ordered.

greek orphanage

Erbil Kücük — Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:54:59 +0000

reading plato nomoi stumbled upon following phrase . Nomoi book X 15 last sentense . “if he left children that can be useful for the state so shall the government agancy responsible for care of orhphans also take care of these orphans as like other orphans from the day on their father has been sentensed”

of course plato talking in this discourse about bigotery how people questioning the gods should be sentensed and put to death and how it should be dealt with their remaining children. however the point of interest for us is here the words orphans and government agency responsible for care of orphans.

unfortunately plato did not mention or write more about the subject for us to figure out if there is already an agency for taking care of orphans or wheter it should be established in his utopia. however the taking care of orphans after the execution of their father due to blashpemy or questioning gods is an interesting point. it already talks about an issue that is established in our modern society with the establishemnt of social services previous times under the care of the churches. however a secular government agency taking care of social services in ancient greek seems a very modern thought (service).

christian rule

Erbil Kücük — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:49:48 +0000

greece knew the concept of demos and ment the community forming the town made up of the aristrocracy or the free people of the demos exclude slaves and woman however there was a sent of equality and freedom for the free of the town rule was given away by election and no rule was passed down from father to son after the death of the ruler.

romans extended the concept and realised the model of res publica rule of the public and created the concept of populi romani the population of romans and went further then the concept of the ruling aristrocracy in greece it included the plebs non aristrocratic non ground owning regular folk.

the christian rule reversed that concept. it reduced the society to a flok again. a dumb crowd that needs the rule of a moral superior being. the christian rule shared the rule between the rule of the spirit leaving it to the church and the rule of the sword and earth giving it to the king and the aristrocracy. the concept of populi and demos are given up totally.

people are again ruled by the cocepts of shepheards. the state models and concepts of citizens or inhabitants developed in babylon, greece and rome are given up. in this case christianity was a step back in time and giving up of all achievement made in thousands of years.

the christian rule based on land owner ship collapsed in the industrial revolution. factory ownership, distribution of goods and the superority coming through a technical achievement as well as the property of industry to a class of non clerics and non aristrocrats made a shift in power. the refusal of clericy and aristrocracy to switch to new ownership and stick to the old made the end of christian rule in europe.

kings and fools

Erbil Kücük — Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:24:06 +0000

we had intelligent people ruling the world we had stupid people ruling the world we had religious people ruling the world we had non believers ruling the world we had moral people ruling the world we had immoral people ruling the world we had rich people ruling the world we had poverty ruling the world we had philosophers as kings and we had jerks as presidents not much left to try out

greek geek bailout

Erbil Kücük — Fri, 07 May 2010 20:26:07 +0000

geeky greeks screwed europes economy stuffed their butt with european subsidies the fat cow on the aegaeis shattered the european economy for weeks the european economists struggle how to turn the wheel to a progressive way handicapt through the british elections action was slow not to scare away the poeple and keep the right people on office the true face will show soon greeks used to receive european subsidies lived beyond their standard spoiled by european politicians get used to that as if it were their own achievement stuffed their butts until they hardly can walk when the europeans stopped stiffing their butt and the greek government forced to cut further the greek people were able again to walk and they walked and occupied some strategic points in city to show off feed our butts feed our butts they cried when european politicians refused to give further food and the greek governemnt couldn´t affort since they are not able to create as the greek population doesn´t produce as much as their butt eat so the greeky geek issue became an issue for europe since they share the same currency it menace to drag down their currency spanish and portugese butts waiting in line to get stiffed and stuffed too it really became a threatening issue do the working people in europe name britian france germany and the scandinaves produce enough to stiff the southern lazy unproductive butts of these goat fuckers and donkey riders hardly but they are forced to slave for them since letting them down would put a price on their butt and gordon brown lost his lately they have to think for a solution to this affair

criminal colony

Erbil Kücük — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:24:35 +0000

do you love criminals – once upon a time not long ago there was a continent called australia named after the southern wind austro where great britain used to ship his prisinors for to store them . since the empire was great so it have to be his prisons as they had many people to store . whenever someone broke the law and violated good manners and courtosy they used to ship them there . after a while these prisinors and their ancestors created a great nation . a nation all people like . and as we see today become a champion of political correctness and square internet censorship. so what we learn from history . the outlaw of yesterday is the square shithead of tomorrow that everyone loves to like . what about our today´s outlaws and prisinors.

ethnic minority

Erbil Kücük — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:10:01 +0000

a spoiled boy got everything from life what he wanted never confronted with rejection never saw obsticals hurdles in life since they were removed from parents and other parenting people.

so he grew up in a free way without hinder.

then it comes the point in life where he has to step out into society work relationship and other things.

never witnessed refusal and a hindering event he will be confronted with the obvious. he will see what we all see in life. rejection through other people. rejection through the system that only wants you in a specific form. not accepting you as the center of life but a tool for it´s purpose.

instead of doing what we all do in life. fight for our interest or adapt to the situation to gain a profit in a altered form the spoiled will take it personal. it will take the ordinary obsticle we all face as a personal rejection. he will not fight for his interest since he is used to get without fighting for it he is used to cry to get what he wants. he does not know how to fight for his interests in this system since he was never part of this system and never gained skills in this system to work for his profit.

so he will be a crybaby blaming the world and others for something everyone faces and everyone manages to turn to individual profit. but not this one. this one will sit in his corner cry about the evil in the world and will remain selfrightious selfcentered unable to work for his profit.

now let this boy be a member of a ethnic minority. he will feel he is rejected due to his ethnic origin. he will think it is excluded from the system since he is different. he will think he faces the obsticals and hurdles because he is a minority. he will not fight for his interest since he thinks the system does not want him in their middle. he will turn his back to the system and will join other cry babies in a ethnic group circle blaming the outer world for their evil and build a ethnic segragation. it will join a own ethnic only group and will actively work to keep that group close together. it will build conciousness of the group and will not allow the outer groups to enter this group. it will create a own reality that will do everything to keep the outer reality and the reality of those who he feels rejected him out of his group. ethnic stereotypes are established. ethnic segragation is established. ethnic groups are established. ethnic gangs are established.

you find this pattern in almost all areas.

blow up moslem

Erbil Kücük — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:42:42 +0000

Dictionary. Definition Moslem. (source: Erbil´s Dictionary 2009. deluxe edition)

Moslem [moslm] . 1. A person of moslem believe. 2. A person blowing himself up when becoming angry. 3. A person blowing himself up in a public place as a form of political protest . 4. A person believing in a judicary system containing hacking off limbs and stoning as a punishment. 5. A person belonging to a society covering woman and girls under cloaks invisible to the public eye. 6. A person belonging to a society with a male only public presence property ownership and judicial rights .