greece knew the concept of demos and ment the community forming the town made up of the aristrocracy or the free people of the demos exclude slaves and woman however there was a sent of equality and freedom for the free of the town rule was given away by election and no rule was passed down from father to son after the death of the ruler.
romans extended the concept and realised the model of res publica rule of the public and created the concept of populi romani the population of romans and went further then the concept of the ruling aristrocracy in greece it included the plebs non aristrocratic non ground owning regular folk.
the christian rule reversed that concept. it reduced the society to a flok again. a dumb crowd that needs the rule of a moral superior being. the christian rule shared the rule between the rule of the spirit leaving it to the church and the rule of the sword and earth giving it to the king and the aristrocracy. the concept of populi and demos are given up totally.
people are again ruled by the cocepts of shepheards. the state models and concepts of citizens or inhabitants developed in babylon, greece and rome are given up. in this case christianity was a step back in time and giving up of all achievement made in thousands of years.
the christian rule based on land owner ship collapsed in the industrial revolution. factory ownership, distribution of goods and the superority coming through a technical achievement as well as the property of industry to a class of non clerics and non aristrocrats made a shift in power. the refusal of clericy and aristrocracy to switch to new ownership and stick to the old made the end of christian rule in europe.



[...] This post was Twitted by ErbilK [...]
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Erbil Kücük, Erbil Kücük. Erbil Kücük said: my latest blog post http://tinyurl.com/35s9u3e compare christian concepts of rule with heathen state models [...]
Boston Ma Taxi…
I love your blog if you need a Boston TaxiTEXT me!…